Why Clawson’s Master Plan Protects Our Charm (Unlike Royal Oak’s Path)
- electtinlin2025
- Oct 9
- 2 min read
Updated: Oct 10
When neighbors ask about the difference between Clawson’s Master Plan and what cities like Royal Oak are doing, the answer is simple: scale and vision.
Royal Oak’s plan leans heavily on higher-density growth. Their downtown is a regional hub, and their master plan is built around mixed-use towers, form-based zoning, and larger projects that attract big developers. That’s their path — and it makes sense for their size and demand. But it’s not the right fit for Clawson.
Clawson’s Approach: Measured, Community-First Growth
Clawson’s Master Plan, newly approved this year, has one clear priority: protecting what makes Clawson special.
We’re talking about improving infrastructure, fixing parking, and making downtown more walkable.
The focus is on sustainability and neighborhood character — not on replacing blocks with out-of-scale buildings.
And most importantly, every step of the plan has included citizen input.
That community voice makes sure the end result reflects what Clawson residents actually want, not what outside developers push.
Why Clawson Won’t Be Overbuilt
Here’s why you can trust that Clawson’s charm is safe:
Size matters: Our smaller market and downtown footprint simply don’t support massive high-rises.
Public input:Â Residents and small businesses are shaping the plan through workshops, surveys, and Planning Commission oversight.
Smart zoning:Â Current zoning and Downtown Development Authority (DDA) guidelines limit building heights and protect neighborhood transitions.
Infrastructure focus: The plan addresses drainage, parking, and walkability — practical needs, not overbuilding.
This isn’t about turning Clawson into the next Royal Oak. It’s about keeping Clawson… Clawson.
Â
The Bottom Line
Clawson’s new Master Plan is about balancing growth with preservation. We can add the revenue we need to maintain city services while protecting our small-town charm. That means smart, modest development — not the kind of overbuild that swallows up character.


